2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
Model | Tracker | Smart |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2370 mm |