2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2003 Seat Altea
To start off, 2003 Seat Altea is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 106 kg more than 2003 Seat Altea.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Seat Altea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Seat Altea (320 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 2003 Seat Altea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2003 Seat Altea | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | Tracker | Altea |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1434 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2470 mm |