2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (120 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer (176 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Chevrolet Tracker 2004 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Chevrolet Mitsubishi
Model Tracker Lancer
Year Released 2001 2004
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 176 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2510 mm