2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Nissan Terrano II
To start off, 2004 Nissan Terrano II is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,389 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Terrano II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (127 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Terrano II. (116 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Terrano II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Terrano II weights approximately 565 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Terrano II (197 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (183 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Terrano II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 Nissan Terrano II | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | Tracker | Terrano II |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 116 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 197 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1752 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2660 mm |