2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Rover 45

To start off, 2004 Rover 45 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 45 (115 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 45 should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover 45, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 45. (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 45.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Chevrolet Tracker 2004 Rover 45
Make Chevrolet Rover
Model Tracker 45
Year Released 2001 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1588 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 115 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 138 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2630 mm