2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2005 Ford Bantam is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,753 cc, 2005 Ford Bantam is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2005 Ford Bantam. (59 HP @ 4550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Bantam.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Bantam. (106 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2005 Ford Bantam | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | Bantam |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1753 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4550 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2730 mm |