2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (127 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1117 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-250 (388 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (183 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | E-250 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 225 HP |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 2304 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3510 mm |
