2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 298 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Suzuki Reno. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (217 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (171 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2005 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Tracker | Reno |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 126 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 171 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1242 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2610 mm |