2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 233 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (127 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (183 Nm). This means 2006 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Tracker | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
