2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2009 Honda CR-V

To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Honda CR-V (164 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (127 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 58 kg more than 2009 Honda CR-V.

Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Honda CR-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda CR-V (220 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (183 Nm). This means 2009 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. 2009 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: