2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 415 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. 2009 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Tracker | 6 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2488 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 169 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 228 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2730 mm |
