2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Mazda 6

To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 105 kg more than 2010 Mazda 6.

Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (217 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 6. (193 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 6. 2010 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2001 Chevrolet Tracker 2010 Mazda 6
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Tracker 6
Year Released 2001 2010
Body Type SUV Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2499 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 0 HP 153 HP
Torque 217 Nm 193 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1540 kg 1435 kg
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4755 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1795 mm
Vehicle Height 1700 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2789 mm