2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (127 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2010 Renault Megane. (112 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Megane.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Renault Megane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (183 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Megane. (152 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2010 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
| Model | Tracker | Megane |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 127 HP | 112 HP |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1470 mm |
