2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2010 Subaru Outback is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Subaru Outback weights approximately 119 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Subaru Outback (335 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 2010 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. 2010 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2010 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
| Model | Tracker | Outback |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 256 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 335 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1659 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1669 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2741 mm |
