2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 5,200 cc (10 cylinders), 2012 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (539 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. 2012 Audi R8 has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi R8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2012 Audi R8 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
| Model | Tracker | R8 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 5200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 560 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 539 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1267 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2649 mm |
