2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2012 Brilliance BS6
To start off, 2012 Brilliance BS6 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 95 kg more than 2012 Brilliance BS6.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Brilliance BS6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (217 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Brilliance BS6. (214 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Brilliance BS6.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2012 Brilliance BS6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Brilliance |
Model | Tracker | BS6 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2351 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 152 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 214 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2800 mm |