2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2012 Ford F-350
To start off, 2012 Ford F-350 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford F-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-350 (548 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. 2012 Ford F-350 has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford F-350 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2012 Ford F-350 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Tracker | F-350 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 385 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 548 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 6269 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3967 mm |
