2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2012 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2012 Subaru Outback is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Subaru Outback (170 HP) has 43 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (127 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Outback weights approximately 368 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Subaru Outback (230 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (183 Nm). This means 2012 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2012 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Chevrolet | Subaru |
Model | Tracker | Outback |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 183 Nm | 230 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1555 kg |