2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 381 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo XC60 (400 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. 2012 Volvo XC60 has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo XC60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Tracker | XC60 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2748 mm |