2001 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 343 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (353 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 2001 Chevrolet Tracker has manual transmission. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chevrolet Tracker | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
Model | Tracker | CHARGER |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 288 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 8-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1883 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3052 mm |