2001 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1964 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 251 more horse power than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1600 kg more than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (374 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 341 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (33 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2001 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1964 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 4157 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 269 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 374 Nm | 33 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2060 mm |
