2001 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2001 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 560 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chrysler Concorde (258 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2001 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chrysler Concorde | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Concorde | 220 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2737 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4850 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |
