2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 943 kg more than 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1999 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Grand Voyager | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 2001 | 1999 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 4998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1943 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2680 mm |