2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2007 Holden Epica
To start off, 2007 Holden Epica is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 320 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2007 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Grand Voyager | Epica |
Year Released | 2001 | 2007 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |