2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 13 more horse power than 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (224 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Grand Voyager | Epica |
Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 224 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |