2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager (145 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1343 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager (320 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2010 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Chrysler | Tata |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Nano |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2425 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 320 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1943 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 37 L |
