2001 Chrysler LHS vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chrysler LHS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chrysler LHS would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chrysler LHS (250 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chrysler LHS should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 285 kg more than 2001 Chrysler LHS.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (344 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chrysler LHS. (332 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chrysler LHS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chrysler LHS | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
| Model | LHS | Mountaineer |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 344 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 9.7:1 |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1632 kg | 1917 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 85 L |
