2001 Chrysler LHS vs. 2009 Volvo S80
To start off, 2009 Volvo S80 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chrysler LHS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chrysler LHS would be higher. At 4,412 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S80 (311 HP @ 5950 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2001 Chrysler LHS. (250 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2001 Chrysler LHS.
Because 2009 Volvo S80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Chrysler LHS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S80 (441 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chrysler LHS. (332 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chrysler LHS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chrysler LHS | 2009 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | LHS | S80 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 4412 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5950 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3950 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 18.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 70 L |
