2001 Chrysler Neon vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 2001 Chrysler Neon is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2001 Chrysler Neon. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2001 Chrysler Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 84 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chrysler Neon | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | Neon | Polara |
Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 5905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1609 kg | 1525 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2960 mm |