2001 Chrysler Neon vs. 1965 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2001 Chrysler Neon is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lincoln Continental (284 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2001 Chrysler Neon. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2001 Chrysler Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 797 kg more than 2001 Chrysler Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chrysler Neon | 1965 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Chrysler | Lincoln |
Model | Neon | Continental |
Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1609 kg | 2406 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3210 mm |