2001 Chrysler Neon vs. 1982 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2001 Chrysler Neon is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chrysler Neon (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1982 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 659 kg more than 1982 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chrysler Neon (332 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chrysler Neon | 1982 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | Neon | Lynx |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1609 kg | 950 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2400 mm |