2001 Chrysler Neon vs. 2012 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2012 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chrysler Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2012 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 2012 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chrysler Neon (154 Nm @ 4950 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2001 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chrysler Neon | 2012 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Proton |
| Model | Neon | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 154 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2610 mm |
