2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser weights approximately 75 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
| Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
| Model | PT Cruiser | Polara |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2424 cc | 5905 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1525 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2960 mm |
