2001 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1986 Volvo 242

To start off, 2001 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Volvo 242. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Volvo 242 would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Chrysler Voyager (172 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1986 Volvo 242. (97 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 1986 Volvo 242. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 510 kg more than 1986 Volvo 242. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1986 Volvo 242 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Volvo 242. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chrysler Voyager (285 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Volvo 242. (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2001 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Volvo 242. 2001 Chrysler Voyager has automatic transmission and 1986 Volvo 242 has manual transmission. 1986 Volvo 242 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Chrysler Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: