2001 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2009 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ranger (141 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2001 Chrysler Voyager. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2001 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Chrysler Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Ranger (330 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chrysler Voyager. (311 Nm). This means 2009 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Chrysler Voyager | 2009 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Voyager | Ranger |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 311 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |