2001 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 1996 Ford Ka
To start off, 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Citroen C-Crosser has automatic transmission and 1996 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 1996 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Citroen C-Crosser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C-Crosser | 1996 Ford Ka | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C-Crosser | Ka |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 58 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3630 mm |