2001 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Citroen C-Crosser has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2000 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Citroen C-Crosser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C-Crosser | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C-Crosser | Mustang |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 5409 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 385 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4620 mm |