2001 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 2000 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Smart ForFour. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Smart ForFour would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Smart ForFour. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C-Crosser | 2000 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Citroen | Smart |
Model | C-Crosser | ForFour |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3760 mm |