2001 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Citroen C-Crosser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Citroen C-Crosser would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Citroen C-Crosser has automatic transmission and 2005 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2005 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Citroen C-Crosser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Citroen C-Crosser | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Citroen | MCC |
| Model | C-Crosser | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 2630 mm |
