2001 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Citroen C-Crosser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Citroen C-Crosser would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Citroen C-Crosser has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Citroen C-Crosser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C-Crosser | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C-Crosser | 3 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4550 mm |