2001 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Citroen C-Crosser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Citroen C-Crosser would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C-Crosser | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Citroen | Cadillac |
Model | C-Crosser | CTS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 318 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4859 mm |