2001 Citroen C-Crosser vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Citroen C-Crosser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Citroen C-Crosser would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Citroen C-Crosser has automatic transmission and 2013 Volvo C30 has manual transmission. 2013 Volvo C30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Citroen C-Crosser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Citroen C-Crosser | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | C-Crosser | C30 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4266 mm |
