2001 Citroen C vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2001 Citroen C is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Ford Mustang (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 2001 Citroen C. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Ford Mustang weights approximately 171 kg more than 2001 Citroen C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C | Mustang |
Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2750 mm |