2001 Citroen C2 vs. 1972 Mazda 818
To start off, 2001 Citroen C2 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Mazda 818 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda 818 (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2001 Citroen C2. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda 818 should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda 818 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2001 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda 818 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Citroen C2. (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda 818 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C2 | 1972 Mazda 818 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C2 | 818 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2320 mm |