2001 Citroen C2 vs. 1989 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Citroen C2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2001 Citroen C2. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen C2.
Because 1989 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Citroen C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C2 | 1989 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C2 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2001 | 1989 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4690 mm |