2001 Citroen C2 vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2001 Citroen C2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2001 Citroen C2. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Mazda Midge weights approximately 36 kg more than 2001 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Citroen C2. (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1994 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Citroen C2 | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | C2 | Midge |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
