2001 Citroen C2 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 2,343 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2001 Citroen C2. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 540 kg more than 2001 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (215 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Citroen C2. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C2 | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | C2 | Outlander |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |