2001 Citroen C2 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2001 Citroen C2. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen C2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Citroen C2 (112 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2001 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C2 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | C2 | Micra |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 112 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 46 L |