2001 Citroen C3 vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2001 Citroen C3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Riley Kestrel (64 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2001 Citroen C3. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Citroen C3 weights approximately 68 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Citroen C3 (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2001 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Citroen C3 | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Citroen | Riley |
| Model | C3 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 96 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 978 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 25 L |
