2001 Citroen C3 vs. 2000 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2001 Citroen C3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Smart ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Smart ForTwo would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Citroen C3 (87 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Citroen C3 weights approximately 74 kg more than 2000 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Citroen C3 (115 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Smart ForTwo. (110 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2001 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Smart ForTwo. 2001 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 2000 Smart ForTwo has manual transmission. 2000 Smart ForTwo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Citroen C3 | 2000 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Citroen | Smart |
Model | C3 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |